<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Democrat vs. Democratic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salas.com/2008/08/21/democrat-vs-democratic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salas.com/2008/08/21/democrat-vs-democratic/</link>
	<description>Some stuff I just figured out</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 04:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://www.salas.com/2008/08/21/democrat-vs-democratic/comment-page-1/#comment-42800</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Schwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 18:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salas.com/2008/08/21/democrat-vs-democratic/#comment-42800</guid>
		<description>I think the harshness comes from the fact that other adjectives ending in "-crat" generally carry negative connotations.    E.g., bureaucrat, plutocrat, autocrat, technocrat.   I suppose aristocrat can be used in a neutral sense, but it very often isn't.  Can't think of any others at the moment.  Are there any that are really considered complimentary?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the harshness comes from the fact that other adjectives ending in &#8220;-crat&#8221; generally carry negative connotations.    E.g., bureaucrat, plutocrat, autocrat, technocrat.   I suppose aristocrat can be used in a neutral sense, but it very often isn&#8217;t.  Can&#8217;t think of any others at the moment.  Are there any that are really considered complimentary?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
