<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Invest in Innovation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salas.com/2008/11/11/invest-in-innovation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salas.com/2008/11/11/invest-in-innovation/</link>
	<description>Some stuff I just figured out</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 05:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jered</title>
		<link>http://www.salas.com/2008/11/11/invest-in-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-48633</link>
		<dc:creator>Jered</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salas.com/2008/11/11/invest-in-innovation/#comment-48633</guid>
		<description>I like the point he makes, and the idea of a "automotive Silicon Valley," but I think the author misses half the problem.  Yes, investing more money in R&#38;D would be a drop in the bucket compared to the multi-billion dollar bailouts we're doing now... but those same bailouts devalue any investment.

I think there's huge interest in automotive innovation.  But, as long as we have $50 billion dollar bailouts of the existing auto industry, there's no motivation to innovate.  Why would I want to throw my money into making a cheaper, more efficient car, when the established competition will just go to the government and get a subsidy to sell their older tech at the same price?  

This is the problem that crippled Japan's economy for years -- the government propping up failed zombie companies with zero interest loans.  As long as we continue to support failed businesses and have protectionist economic policies, throwing more money at R&#38;D won't do a damn thing.

I think there's also a separate problem of R&#38;D dollars going to bureaucratic institutions like NASA that have all but lost their ability to innovate, but that's a far smaller issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the point he makes, and the idea of a &#8220;automotive Silicon Valley,&#8221; but I think the author misses half the problem.  Yes, investing more money in R&amp;D would be a drop in the bucket compared to the multi-billion dollar bailouts we&#8217;re doing now&#8230; but those same bailouts devalue any investment.</p>
<p>I think there&#8217;s huge interest in automotive innovation.  But, as long as we have $50 billion dollar bailouts of the existing auto industry, there&#8217;s no motivation to innovate.  Why would I want to throw my money into making a cheaper, more efficient car, when the established competition will just go to the government and get a subsidy to sell their older tech at the same price?  </p>
<p>This is the problem that crippled Japan&#8217;s economy for years &#8212; the government propping up failed zombie companies with zero interest loans.  As long as we continue to support failed businesses and have protectionist economic policies, throwing more money at R&amp;D won&#8217;t do a damn thing.</p>
<p>I think there&#8217;s also a separate problem of R&amp;D dollars going to bureaucratic institutions like NASA that have all but lost their ability to innovate, but that&#8217;s a far smaller issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
